Hout and About

 

July 2010

 

The publication of the Residents’ Association of Hout Bay

PO Box 27031, Hout Bay, 7872

rahb@houtbay.org.za            www.houtbay.org.za

 

                                           

 

 

 

In this issue:

Len’s Lines: A message from the Chairperson

How rate changes will hit you

Are we facing a water shortage?

A proven need for additional schools in Imizamo Yethu

Premier and Mayor meet with London Mayor

Right of access to Hout Bay beach via Mariners’ Wharf car park

A warning to cyclists

Ongoing controversy over ‘The Breakers’

To join the Residents Association

Success at 4 Barry Road, Penzance

Fire at Imizamu Yethu

 

 

 

Len’s Lines

 

A message from the Chairperson of the Residents’ Association of Hout Bay

 

"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."Cicero, 55 BC

 

The quotation from Cicero, above, dating to 55 BC, begs the question: what have we learned in 2 064 years?  And the obvious answer: evidently nothing!  Thus, the Hout Bay Residents’ Association remains as committed as ever before to protect and preserve the unique characteristics of our valley, in the face of potentially overwhelming man-made damage to our environment and an intransigent and often recalcitrant ‘officialdom’.

 

What are we asking for?  In the first place we don’t want the sewage to run into the sea anymore.   According to a recent UN report, untreated sewage pouring into the world’s seas and oceans is polluting water and coastlines and endangering the health and welfare of the people and animals that inhabit coastal areas.  As the UN’s chief environmental officer Achim Steiner notes: “Usually the ones who are the source of pollution are not the ones who bear the brunt or the impact of pollution. In many countries we are losing nature’s capacity to actually deal with some of the sewage and effluents because we are destroying the wetlands that could provide us with filtration capacity to avoid the kind of runoff into the sea.”

 

Is it too much to ask that in Hout Bay we should have a complete Sewage Treatment Plant Works that not only does not pump raw sewage out into the sea but also extracts both water and energy in the system?

 

We are being fleeced with higher rates, water and electricity and we wonder how much of the fees we contribute are actually being spent on Hout Bay. As examples, our roads and infrastructure cannot keep pace, and our beaches have been neglected, the Victoria Road bridge is badly in need of repair and above all raw sewage still pours into storm water drains and into the Disa River.

 

How safe is our Valley? While it is almost impossible to extract actual statistics from the authorities, we know that there has been an increase recently in violent crime affecting both residents and businesses in the area.  Where will it end?

 

In this edition of Hout & About we comment on the fire last month in Imizamo Yethu, the appalling lack of schools serving the local population, as well as a host of other pertinent issues.   As always we invite you to submit your comments and inputs.

 

Regards

 

Len Swimmer

Chairperson, Residents Association of Hout Bay

Tel: 021 790 0268; Email: lens@telkomsa.net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How rate changes will hit you

 

As of 1 July, Hout Bay ratepayers can expect to pay an average of 17 percent more on their municipal rates, levies and electricity.

 

Rate changes approved recently by the City Council will result in a typical family spending 10 percent more on water and sanitation, 18 percent more on refuse, 7,8 percent more on property rates and 24,6 percent more on electricity.

 

The electricity increase in the first of three rises approved by the National Electricity Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) and designed to pay for the construction of Eskom power plants, according to the City’s draft budget for 2010/11.

 

The City Council will spend about R1,1 billion to provide relief to the poor through subsidies of

·         R166 million for refuse removal

·         R97 million for free electricity

·         R89 million for free water

·         R67 million for solid waste for informal settlements

·         R60 million for indigent relief for tenants of council-owned houses, and

·         Provision for subsidies of about R110 million for rates rebates.

 

The City has also said that it will spend R308 million this year on upgrades to water and sewerage infrastructure and wants to find a new landfill site because the three existing sties are nearly full – hence the R13 million increase in refuse rates.

 

 

 

Are we facing a water shortage?

 

Many people believe that the electricity crisis will pale into insignificance relative to the water shortage that will hit the country – and particularly the Western Cape – in the coming years and decades.  Against this background, concerned Cape Town citizens are naturally anxious about the City’s continued densification programme, expansion of the urban edge and construction of water-consuming developments.

 

For its part, the Department of Water Affairs’ “Western Cape Water Reconciliation Strategy” newsletter notes as follows:

 

In the past, various interventions were implemented to curb the volume of water required by the people in Cape Town. Droughts, water restrictions etc. all played a role in reducing water demand since the year 2000. This meant that Cape Town would still be able to rely on its existing water resources for quite some years.

 

“In March 2010, during a meeting of the Strategy Steering Committee (SSC) representing all role-players involved in water-related aspects in and around Cape Town, it became clear that the City of Cape Town may NOT able to meet the required decrease in water required. Although the reasons for this are being investigated at the moment, there is a concern about the City’s water requirements which are following the high water requirement curve. Should this growth continue, the decision on which augmentation intervention to implement will have to be made in September 2012. Possible water supply options may need to be fast-tracked, providing challenges to planners and financial implications to water users.”

 

 

 

 

A proven need for additional schools in Imizamo Yethu

 

It is common cause that the number and type of state schools in Hout Bay are totally inadequate for the numbers living here. This is immediately apparent from the immense overcrowding at the only one junior school for Imizamo Yethu, the Oranjekloof Primary School.

 

The planning of a Junior School and, more importantly, a Secondary School, in Imizamo Yethu is way overdue. The only other high school is in Hangberg (the Hout Bay Secondary) and it is completely over subscribed - and is Afrikaans-medium as well.  The situation is critical with many teenagers not being schooled because of the lack of availability of schools.

 

Despite the obvious need, some inhabitants of Imizamo Yethu are resisting a school in the one area of Imizamo Yethu specifically reserved for community facilities such as schools and recreational areas.  They want houses to be built in this area – but there is clearly a hidden agenda here, it has been reported to us that it is possible that people derive a benefit from trafficking in houses in IY.  In any event, to find an alternative area in Hout Bay for the construction of a school will not only be costly but result in further delays as a consequence of the rezoning process.

 

Councillor Marga Haywood points out that as far back as 2002 the City’s own township planning consultants - Chittenden Nicks de Villiers - advised the City planners that, based on the numbers living in the IY area in 2000, in terms of national planning standards there should be provision for 4 primary schools and 2 high schools for this community.  In his words: “This information was totally suppressed by the city’s planners during the public participation process they conducted, nor was it given to the senior decision-making bodies in the city council.”

 

Both the Hout Bay Residents’ Association and the Hout Bay & Llandudno Heritage Trust have raised these concerns with the appropriate authorities, including the Provincial Minister of Local Government, Environmental Affairs & Development Planning, with the request that urgent consideration be given to the development of sorely-needed additional schools in Hout Bay.

 

 

 

Premier and Mayor meet with London Mayor

 

Western Cape Premier Helen Zille and Cape Town Mayor Dan Plato recently met with the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, to discuss best practices for hosting international sporting events.  Mayor Johnson was on a fact-finding visit to South Africa and met with various political leaders to learn from their experience of hosting the 2010 FIFA World Cup.

 

Johnson sought to discover first-hand how the City of Cape Town prepared for the World Cup and to learn from its working relationships with other host cities, particularly in preparation for the 2012 Games and potential 2018 World Cup in London

 

“The organisers have done a superb job so far in managing one of the greatest sporting events on the planet and I am more than happy to learn from the experts on how best to enhance London and England's chances of becoming a host,” said Johnson.

 

 

 

 

Right of access to Hout Bay beach via Mariners’ Wharf car park

 

The parking area known as Mariners’ Wharf Beach car park has long been the subject of controversy, particularly with reference to its exclusive use by patrons of the Mariners Wharf restaurant.  While, in point of fact, the parking areas are either on privately owned land or land that has been leased from Council or the State, it has recently been reported to us that - on at least one portion of this area (‘the Remainder of Erf 1141’), which is leased by Council - the restaurant has no right to block public access to the beach.

 

The issue arose after security guards, apparently under instruction from the owner of Mariners’ Wharf restaurant, prevented surfski paddlers from parking in the affected area, thus denying them access to the beach.  Intrepid Hout Bay citizen Johann Van Blerck, representing a paddling club with some 400 direct members, sought clarification from the South Peninsula Regional authorities.

 

After investigation, administrative officer Beverley Cathcart of the City’s South Peninsula Region advised as follows:

 

“Regarding the use of the parking area by the public, the following are conditions contained in the lease agreement for the Remainder of Erf 1141 Hout Bay:-

 

The LESSEE shall permit the public to continue the use of the PREMISES, as a parking area, after the completion of the Agreement, without interruption and exclusively for that purpose, unless he is authorised, in writing, by the LESSOR to cease such use for such period or periods as may be determined by the LESSOR.

 

There is nothing in the lease agreement that states that the parking is for the exclusive use of patrons of the restaurant.”

 

Prior to this outcome of this investigation Johann Van Blerck advised that the owner of the restaurant had relented and that his security guards had been instructed to allow paddlers to once again park in the affected area, thus defusing the situation.  Clarification of the legal principle of public access to the beach via Erf 1141 is nevertheless significant.

 

 

 

A warning to cyclists

 

Hout Bay resident Alma de Beer has called upon local cyclists to take extra care, following a recent spate of attacks on Cycle and mountain Club members in Johannesburg.

 

“Most recently, eight cyclists were held up at gunpoint and robbed of their valuables near Diepsloot and there have been other similar attacks reported in recent weeks. While these attacks have largely been confined to the Johannesburg area, we know that Cape Town often follows the trends set by Johannesburg. Officials often turn a blind eye as they regard it as a case of rich people’s toys being stolen. It’s important for cyclists to take precautions, and to ensure they have access to the Eblockwatch Cycle Support Hotline 0822360015,” she says.

 

 

 

 

Ongoing controversy over ‘The Breakers’

 

The Hout Bay Residents’ Association is firmly of the view that height restrictions are problematical in the case of ‘The Breakers’ development in Hout Bay, and has repeatedly requested to know why the development has been allowed to proceed.   After interminable attempts to seek clarity on the matter from the authorities, it finally appears that the height of this development was determined using a ‘simple mean average’ rather than a ‘weighted mean average’.

 

In the words of Residents’ Association Chairman Len Swimmer: “Our worst fears were realised at a recent meeting with the officials where we were informed that the building was passed because the simple mean average of the building is below the 11m height restriction.

 

“We believe that the height restrictions were put in place in order to maintain the character of the local environment and that new buildings should be in harmony with their surroundings. Unfortunately our cries were not heeded years ago when this building was going up. It is our belief that it was originally approved by officials who did not properly apply their minds to the issue.’

 

Land surveyor Trevor Stander confirms that the method used to justify the height of the development is fundamentally flawed.  He writes as follows: “A weighted mean, as opposed to a simple mean, is the correct way to calculate the average of any number of variables (e.g. roof heights) of differing sizes, and this method (weighted mean) is used commonly by land surveyors for various calculations, e.g. in calculating if a basement qualifies as a basement under the city of Cape Town zoning scheme. To apply a simple mean in the case of the Breakers’ roofs is a mathematically flawed method. In any case, the debate of what type of mean to apply is irrelevant.

 

“I believe that one cannot split a building into various portions and then mean the roof heights of each portion. As soon as a portion of a building is considered to be a ‘building’, (as per the zoning scheme definition), then each portion of the building must comply with the 11m restriction. If not, one could then have the absurd example of a development with 16 different roofs, 8 could be 18m high, the other 8 could be 4m high, giving an average of 11m.  If any one roof is permitted to exceed 11m, then how high can that roof be permitted to be?”

 

The Residents Association has called upon Councillor Taki Amira, the Chairman of the Good Hope Sub Council, and the City’s Planning Environment Policy Committee (PEPCO) to close the loop hole so as to ensure that the same method is not used by officials in the future as a means of determining the height of buildings.

 

 

 

To join the Residents Association:

 

Contact us via email on rahb@houtbay.org.za

Membership forms available from Chairperson (see above) or Hout Bay Library

Membership fee: R50 per couple; R30 per individual

Banking details for payment of subscriptions: FNB Hout Bay (code 204009), Account: Residents Association of Hout Bay, account number 5345 1027 173

(Payment may be made electronically or manually via our wooden box at the Library or by post at Post Office Box 27031, Hout Bay, 7872)

 

 

 

Success at 4 Barry Road, Penzance

 

It’s always pleasing when the intervention of the Residents’ Association results in a successful opposition to an unlawful or undesireable property application.  We re-reprint here an edited version of a letter received from Patrick and Joyce McLaughlin of 1 Barry Road, Hout Bay.

 

“I wish to place on record the unstinting and exceptional assistance provided by RAHB in fighting the case of the application by E Chesler to apply for a land departure in the private residential area of 4 Barry Road to run a motor repair and workshop in the cul de sac at the Berg en Dal end of Barry Road, Penzance, where we live opposite.

 

The repair shop has been run illegally for some ten years now into the road without any walls or gates onto the road with the repair shop in full view of passers by; such industrial activity in a residential area causing not only noise and unsightly activity but reducing the value of all nearby properties. We complained bitterly but nothing was done. The final blow was when motor bike repairs were added to list of repairs being undertaken. The noise became unbearable with visitors any time of the day, cars being delivered, collected and stored.

 

Eventually, with the assistance of RAHB a noise disturbance was brought against the owners of the repair workshop for noisy car repair work on Boxing Day last year but this did not deter the owner who continued, furthermore, bringing a land departure application for the continuance legally as a motor repair shop. Objections were submitted by over 16 residents including the Penzance Action Group and ourselves but despite this, Town Planning evaluators acceded to the request to have such motor repair shop in a residential area with the absurd conditions that the garage doors of the workshop be kept closed at all times, all objections from neighbours being overruled.

 

We despaired and we had just about given up all hope that there was any practical law enforcement left but Len Swimmer encouraged us to continue with the fight and took the matter up with senior city officials. The case still went to Sub Council for hearing of objections to the proposal of granting a land departure to run a motor repair workshop for gain, and we were advised to attend and ask for the matter to go on appeal.

 

The matter was heard by Councillor Taki Amira as Chairperson, with Len Swimmer and Councillor Marga Hayward all present before him and more councillors from nearby wards in Cape Town in attendance. I am pleased to be able to report that the matter was completely “thrown out of court” by the City of Cape Town Sub Council and the town planning department in Plumstead reprimanded for even considering such a proposal in the first case.

 

It was only with the ongoing support and advice of RAHB, and the support of many residents in Penzance that justice, the rights of residents to a peaceful co-existence and the protection of the land usage legislation, was upheld.

 

All it takes it seems is a little tenacity to stand up for one’s rights and to refuse to be intimidated by officialdom for fear that nothing works in the City any more.  Thank you, Len Swimmer and your Board and those residents of Penzance who encouraged us to keep going and for your advice along the way.

 

The garage is closed by order. The owner of the garage has successfully sold 4 Barry Road and left the country; peace and tranquillity has returned to Barry Road and our cul de sac and the new owners are already tidying up the mess.”

 

 

 

 

Fire at Imizamo Yethu!

 

 

 

On the evening of 15 June 2010, a fire started in Imizamo Yethu when a resident left a stove burning.  It started at 19h20 on Tuesday evening and was only brought under control at 01h00 the next morning.  Although the fire department, Watchcom, emergency number 107 and police were alerted immediately, the fire truck arrived with a half empty tank of water. The fire spread to more shacks while a second fire engine was called from Constantia. Eventually 40 shacks were destroyed.  Mark Wiley, member of the Provincial Legislature, has undertaken to follow up with the Fire Department to find out the causes of what appears to have been unnecessary delays in handling the emergency.

 

Residents Association members joined SANCO in organizing a soup kitchen and food for those who lost their homes. The City undertook to provide a pack of material for rebuilding for each family that had had its structure destroyed, while the victims formed a committee to monitor the rebuilding of the homes to exclude newcomers and to make sure that the donations went only to victims.

 

Fortunately on this occasion the fire was in a position that was reasonably accessible to the Fire Department.  Given the problem of illegal electrical wiring connections which prevent emergency vehicles from accessing much of the informal settlement, on top of gross overcrowding, the Residents Association remains concerned that future fires may have far more devastating consequences.

 

 

The Residents’ Association acknowledges, with thanks, the support of Patrick Maingard, Hout Bay Franchise Principal of Pam Golding Properties (Pty) Ltd