Hout and About
News
from Residents’ Association of
rahb@houtbay.org.za
www.houtbay.org.za
February
2010
Imizamo Yethu
On the 18th of January, the following
objectors were afforded a 15 minute interview each at a Special Sub Council
meeting following the highlighting, by Cllr Hayward, of irregularities in the
IY development planning processes.
Mr T Brummer (Penzance Action Group and others)
Mr L Swimmer (Residents Assoc of
Mr G Ngwangwa (Sinethemba Civic Assoc)
Mr C Nathan (Hout Bay Ratepayers Assoc)
Mr R Timms (
Mr E Schaug (Architect)
The
resultant report to the Executive Mayor, dated 25 January is quoted in full
below:
At
a Special meeting of the Spatial Planning, Environment and Land Use Management
Committee held on Thursday 21 January 2010, the following matters were
considered:
a) Supplementary report dated 13 January 2010 plus
accompanying Annexures A (delegations), B (layout plan), C (Council minute
extract dated 26 November 2009), D
(Spelum minutes dated 14 October 2009),
and E (summary public participation land use Imizamo Yethu Hout Bay dated 07
September 2009) from Mr R Walton;
b) Report to Spelum from the Good Hope Subcouncil from
their special meeting held on 18 January 2010 as per Annexure F with Addendums
A (Supplementary report dated 13 January 2010 from R Walton), B (layout plan
tabled by Mr Dods), and C (layout plan submitted by Mr T Brummer).
The
special meeting was also attended by the Good Hope Subcouncil Chairperson (
Cllr T Amira) and the Ward Councillor
(Cllr M Haywood).
The
matter was deliberated on at length with specific changes proposed after having
reached agreement thereon by those present.
Concern was
expressed as to sewage flow/ seepage into the stormwater ponds during the heavy
rain periods in that area.
RECOMMENDATION
FROM THE SPATIAL PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
(SPSPEL 03 /01/10) 21. 01.10
RESOLVED
1.
TO
RECOMMEND to COUNCIL that it recommends
to the Competent Authority that:
1.1
the proposed Amendment of a Condition of
Designation, in terms of the Less Formal Township Establishment Act, 1991 (Act
113 of 1991) shown as per the “Amended Annexure “A” of the report, BE APPROVED, and
1.2
the proposed amendment of the Approved Layout Plan
required in terms of the conditions imposed in the notices of promulgation in
terms of Section 3(1) read with Section 4 of the Less Formal Township
Establishment Act, 1991 (Act 113 of 1991) on portion of Remainder Erven 6355,
Hout Bay, as per the ”Amended Annexure “A” of the report, BE APPROVED, and
1.3
the proposed Layout Plan required in terms of the
conditions imposed in the notices of promulgation in terms of Section 3(1) read
with Section 4 of the Less Formal Township Establishment Act, 1991 (Act 113 of
1991) on Erf 7309 and on portions of Remainder Erven 2848, Hout Bay, shown as
per the “Amended Annexure “A” of the report, BE APPROVED, and
1.4
the proposed Rezoning in terms of Sections 17 of the
Land Use Planning Ordinance, 15 of 1985, and 7296, Hout Bay, as per the ”Amended
Annexure “A” of the report , BE APPROVED.
1.5
All approvals are subject to the conditions as per
the”Amended Annexure “A” of the
report.
AMENDED
ANNEXURE A
_
File Reference: LUM/33/2848
Application No.: 181161
In these conditions:
“Council” means the City of
“The Owner” means the registered owner of
the property.
“The property” means Portions of Remainder Erven 2848, 6355 and 7296 and ERF
7309,
“scheme regulations” has the meaning assigned thereto by
Ordinance 15 of 1985.
1. AMENDMENT OF A CONDITION OF
DESIGNATION IN TERMS OF THE
1.1 To amend the condition in Designation Notice
PN 383/1993 of July 1993 that;
“Only 18 ha of the total area shall be utilized for
residential purposes”.
To the following:
“Not more than a maximum of 21 ha of the
total area of 34 ha as contained in Designation Notice PN 383/1993 of July 1993
shall be utilized for residential purposes. The remaining 13ha will be used for
non residential purposes which include any land required for roads (including
reserves), open spaces, roadside fringes, thoroughfares, public spaces, and/or
public-service facilities in the total area concerned.”
“That the MEC be requested to declare that the
provision of the Land Use Planning Ordinance (No 15 of 1985) be made applicable
to the designated land”.
2. AMENDMENT OF APPROVED LAYOUT REQUIRED IN TERMS OF
THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED IN THE NOTICES OF PROMULGATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 3(1)
READ WITH SECTION 4 OF THE LESS FORMAL TOWNSHIP ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 1991 (ACT 113 of 1991)
2.1 That the layout plan on Site 1 as it appears
on the subdivision plan attached as Annexure D2; portion of Erf 6355, be
recommended to the Competent Authority for approval, subject to the following
amendments being made to such plan prior to the submission to the Competent
Authority:
2.1.1 A 5 metre Public Open Space to be provided
along the boundary with Hughenden Estate,
2.1.2 That the loop roads in this layout be extended
to the 5 metre Public Open Space,
2.1.3 Single Residential Erven to be provided where
the layout abuts the 5 metre Public open Space or any property affronting
towards such Public Open Space.
3. APPROVAL
OF LAYOUT REQUIRED IN TERMS OF THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED IN THE NOTICES OF
PROMULGATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 3(1) READ WITH SECTION 4 OF THE LESS FORMAL TOWNSHIP
ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 1991 (ACT 113 of 1991)
3.1 Layout of Sites 1, 2 and 3 as it appears on
the subdivision plan attached as Annexure D2. Portions of Remainder Erf 2848
and Portion of Erf 7309 are recommended to the Competent Authority for approval
subject to the following:
“Site 1”
3.1.1 That, prior to the submission of the layout plan on
Site 1 as it appears on the subdivision plan attached as Annexure D2; the
Competent Authority regarding portion of Erf 6355, needs to approve the
following amendments to such plan:
3.1.1.1
A 5 metre Public
Open Space to be provided along the boundary with Hughenden Estate,
3.1.1.2
That the loop
roads in this layout be extended up to the 5 metre Public Open Space,
3.1.1.3
Single
Residential Erven to be provided where the layout abuts the 5 metre Public Open
Space or any property affronting towards such Public Open Space.
“Site 2”
3.1.2 That, the layout plan be
supported subject to:
3.1.2.1 The construction of the
proposed 19 metre service road running parallel to Hout Bay Main Road, to the
North of portion 57 as per the layout plan for Site 2; as well as the
construction of the proposed taxi rank and informal trading area on this
service road (portions 44, 49 & 62) not be proceeded with until a further
investigation and a TIA of the NR Mandela Road has been completed to replace
such service road as the main collector and feeder route for the larger Imizamo
Yethu development. Any amendments to the layout that may result from such
investigation and findings must be submitted to SPELUM for further
recommendation to the Competent Authority.
3.1.2.2 That the Competent
Authority be requested to consult with the Department of Education about the
possible need to provide a High School within the layout plan for Site 2.
“Site 3”
3.1.3 That, prior to the
submission of the layout plan to the Competent Authority for approval, the
following amendments be made to such plan:
3.1.3.1 A 10 metre wide Public Open Space abutting
3.1.3.2 A road between the
proposed Single Residential Erven and the Public Open Space be provided,
3.1.3.3 GAP housing be provided
on the Single Residential Erven facing Penzance Road, as reflected on the plan
(see Addendum C under cover of Good Hope Subcouncil report dated 21 January
2010),and
3.1.3.4 That no wall to be permitted between the GAP housing and
4. APPROVAL OF REZONING IN TERMS OF SECTION 17 OF THE LAND USE PLANNING ORDINANCE
NO 15 OF 1985
4.1 That, prior to the submission of the plan of
subdivision for approval, the following amendments be made to such plan:
4.1.1 A
10 metre Public Open Space abutting
4.1.2 A road between the
proposed Single Residential Erven and the Public Open Space be provided,
4.1.3 GAP housing be provided on
the Single Residential Erven facing Penzance Road, as reflected on the plan
(see Addendum C under cover of Good Hope Subcouncil report dated 21 January
2010), and
4.1.4 That
no wall be permitted between the GAP housing and
5. CONDITIONS IMPOSED
IN TERMS OF SECTION 42 OF THE LAND USE PLANNING ORDINANCE 15 OF 1985 AND
IN TERMS OF THE LESS FORMAL
TOWNSHIP ESTABLISHMENT ACT, 1991 (ACT 113 of 1991)
Land Use
5.1 The
submission of development plans on all the General Residential zoned sites for
the approval of the Director: Planning and Building Development prior to
building plan submission.
5.2 That
General Residential portions 32 to 35 and 66 to 71, as it appears on the
subdivision plan (Annexure D2) be limited to 2 storey or 8 meters as per the
relevant Zoning Scheme Regulations.
5.3 That
a Site Development Plan (SDP) be submitted for approval for the local
authority, business and civic/community purposes zoned sites in the new layout
of Site 2. This should preferably be in
the form of a comprehensive plan indicating structures, uses, access, parking
etc, but could also be on an erf to erf basis. The SDP are to be approved by the
Director: Planning and Building Development Management, after consultation with
the Subcouncil, prior to any building plans being submitted.
Transport
5.4 The roundabout-controlled intersection of
5.5 The existing single-lane, west-bound approach
to the Victoria Road / Victoria Avenue (from the direction of Main Road to the
Suikerbossie hill) should be doubled to allow a two-lane right-turn approach,
the left lane being right-turn or straight-through, to the intersection.
5.6 Pedestrian
paths must be provided along Nelson Mandela and Hector Peterson Drives, within
the development area. A continuous,
1.8m-wide footway should be provided along
5.7 Appropriate
measures must be investigated and implemented to improve
shoulder-sight-distance at the Hector Peterson main Road intersection.
5.8 The OR Tambo Road access to
5.9 An internal road link should be provided,
linking the two main access roads, and a road hierarchy should be established,
with reserve widths of between 8 and 16m, and “black-top” widths of between 4
and 7m, depending on the road function.
Environment Management
5.10 Landscaping
Plan, compiled by a registered Landscape Architect / Technologist / Technician
for the property concerned, must be submitted and approved by EHRM, in consultation
with the Subcouncil 16 (Good Hope Subcouncil) prior to building plan approval.
5.11 The Landscaping Plan
must also specifically address the public interface along
5.12 The
developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaping for a
minimum period of twelve months from the date of completion.
5.13 Construction
Phase Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) for the site preparation, the
installation of all services and all built structures on the proposed
development must be submitted to Council for the final approval of EMS, by the
Developer before any site clearance, earthworks or site camp establishment
commences. The CEMP must include a site
layout showing the exact locality of the no-go areas, stockpiling, contractor’s
camp, toilets, etc.
5.14 The developer shall appoint
at his/her cost, an independent Environmental Control Officer (ECO), with
appropriate environmental qualifications and experience for the duration of the
works contemplated in the CEMP, in order to monitor compliance by all parties
with the CEMP and requiring the ECO to liaise with the Council’s Environmental
Officers / EHRM on a regular basis, including the submission of monthly
reports.
SERVICES
5.15 That
all services to be provided shall be in accordance with the Council’s required
standards for the provision of services.
5.16
An Open
Letter from Su Ball to Cllr Hayward
“The lay-out plan for IY must provide for a sustainable community and
add value to
The lay-out plan presently envisaged by the City Planners and
consultants does not take this fundamental aspect of
To tightly pack as many people as possible like sardines in the heart of
the Valley is a recipe for disaster. A visual blight will be created scarring
the slopes of Skoorsteenkop. Without sufficient job opportunities and
educational facilities, people will live squashed together without hope for a
better life, a breeding ground for sickness and crime.
Such a plan for high density walk up flats robbed of screening trees and
a gradual interface with the surrounding suburbs will create a visual blight in
the centre of the Valley. Instead of tourists being attracted to the area they
will be repelled. Tourist numbers will dwindle causing businesses dependent on
the tourist industry to collapse having an economic domino effect on
65% of
The preferred
alternative option motivated by the community including IY civic organisations
modifies the ideas of the planners and consultants so that IY can become a
fully integrated suburb with the rest of
Such a plan would
be met with goodwill by the other residents even local philanthropists like
Niall Melon who would be prepared to invest in upliftment projects and housing
schemes in the community.”
Humans
vs Horses vs Humanity
Unfortunately,
a nasty incident escalated on
The
incident was not left there and ended up being publicly aired on Facebook.
There are always two sides to a story and as one party wrote. “I do hope
however that you will be able draw the complainant's attention to the often
unpleasant and unintended results of inaccurate, incomplete and exaggerated
reporting and of using those reports on social networking sites such as
Facebook to target organizations or individuals.”
In
the words of Chairman, Len Swimmer “The horses and their riders are vital part
of our community and an asset to the Hout Bay community, giving it the rural
ambience that so many would deny.”
Publicly
humiliating others does not resolve problems and leaves everyone with a sour
taste in their mouths. With the diversity within our Valley, our beautiful
beach deserves tolerance. Our horses and their riders are very much part of our
community.
Dinglestock
The Association is grateful that the City Councillors and City Officials agreed
with public comments and the objection was upheld in the case of the
Dinglestock Music Concert planned for the 16th of January in Valley
Rd and eventually relocated to Albert Hall, Woodstock.
Advertised as follows:
“THE
MONTONY OF MONOGOMY” is a big fist up the ass of conservative boredom that is
plaguing modern society. If this isn't enough for you, Half Price have raised a
dirty middle finger at the recession by sliding the album into a neat 64 page
magazine filled with all the filthy but intelligent visual stimuli guaranteed
to get your anarchistic juices flowing.”
Following the Association’s objection, Chairman, Len Swimmer, was on the
receiving end of vulgar and derogatory commentary posted on Facebook and e
mailed to him. Len responded in a letter published in The Sentinel Newspaper, Below,
an excerpt and the official City response to the applicant Markus Becker:
“Since the event was refused by the City officials
(see their official notification below and reasons), I have received a large
number messages containing very inappropriate language slating me personally;
these have been posted on face book and also e-mailed to me. Along with
this ‘hate mail’, however, I have also received many warm congratulatory
letters from relieved residents pleased that the rock concert was moved to
another venue. I am copying some of them for you below:
“I am sorry that you seem to have been on the receiving
end of some unpleasant words in the latest issue of The Sentinel. Please accept
a donation to RAHB in appreciation”
And
please don’t slate Mr. Swimmer – he was doing his job. Did it well.
If he had not drawn the attention of the
Please guys – advertised several times on the internet and
twitter etc does not mean you were restricting the function to a mere 400
people. Sorry but you had no consideration of your ‘Bay’.
The Official response from the City
I regret to inform you that the
Events Office will not be able to issue you with a permit for your proposed
event due to the following;
Objection from
Cllr JP Smith (in the absence of Cllr Haywood)
Objection from
the local sub-council manager
Objection from
the impacted residents, residents’ association of
The venue not
being suitable for the type of event planned
Possible
negative environmental, residential and road impact
Not sufficient
guarantee of disaster management safety mitigations
Litter Trolley Service
Local resident Mick Feuilherade has
initiated a Litter cleaning operation under the auspices of Rotary. It
comprises a standard 2-wheeler litter-bin placed into a sturdier steel
frame/cradle supported by rubber wheel-barrow wheels. Rotary covered
the initial costs of the bin. The project is self sustaining through
advertising revenues (ads placed on 4 sides of the bin). The bin which
circulates around a prescribed route gives advertisers a 'roving ' advert.
For the moment Rotary are subsidising
shortfalls as only 2 sides of the 4 available have been sold to advertisers. Anyone
who would like to purchase an advert, please contact Mick on 021 7906096. Apart from ad revenues open
donations will be welcome from the public direct to the vendor (the IY man) to
assist his income package.
The amount of litter being picked up is
amazing and if this initiative is successful Mick plans to introduce a second
trolley service.
Message to Hout and About, from Patrick Mc Laughlin of Rotary: “Here’s
a pic of "Mick's Marvellous Machine" which is now trundling around
Hout Bay on a daily basis.
If all goes well, and we get more advertising support, we shall
get a second one going. Moving advertisements are much better than static ones!
All credit to Mick Feuilherade for this great idea, personally
put in place by him”.
Entelini
and Aliens
After
all the controversy with Entileni and our vigorous attempts to successfully
re-open Chappies, Entileni are reneging on maintenance agreements for the
Drive.
A
local resident, who has single handed cleared Blackburn Ravine of alien
invasive plant species, approached the Association asking where he could next
focus his “alien hacking”.
The
Association approached Dr Preston, Chairperson of Working for Water, who agreed
that Chapman’s
In
addition, it was pointed out that kikuyu grass has been planted by Entilini in
most inappropriate places along the Drive. Dr Preston has previously met with Entilini
and pointed out what needed to be done, but only a small number of wattles were
treated.
In July last year, the local
resident approached the Entilini office manager, Mr Jacobs, to remind him of
Entinlini’s responsibility for clearing the road reserve. Mr Jacobs was not even aware of his duty in
this respect and said it was a priority to stabilise the cuttings above the
road.
The local resident offered
to do a survey and supplied Mr Jacobs with a list of aliens between the last
parking and the lookout. When the resident returned in November, the roadside
was indeed cleared, BUT the contractor had obviously not used the map in the
contract so the work he has done was less than perfect.
Entileni
must be held accountable for their incomplete actions and lack proactive
intervention to keep alien vegetation off
Chappies, without
paper!
When will Entilini get their act together?
Len Swimmer received this e-mail from RAHB member,
Chris Grinton:
Saturday the 09th, and a group of us drove
over Chappies, en-route to Fish Hoek.
There was just one lane open, on a weekend, in early
January! Go figure?
I knew the boom in the left-hand lane had been broken
for four days, (and another 4 days thereafter) but was perplexed why the lane
was not being used, with someone ‘manually’ stopping the cars, etc, which
seemed doable during peak tourist season.
So, I slipped out of the passenger seat in the long
queue (20+ vehicles), and ran towards the closed booth with the broken boom.
The boom was not the problem; they could have operated a manual system, but...
they had run out of ... till paper!
This from Entilini who wish to build a large toll
plaza, when they have frequent problems running the existing set up.
Till
paper is like toilet paper – you do not buy more when you run out; you have a
roll or 3 on hand, for just such emergencies!
(there
was apparently none in the offices or any of the other booths – they had
simply ‘run out’.
I considered NOT writing this letter, but 4 days
previously had misplaced my frequent-user card, so called ahead to order a new
one, was instructed to pop in ‘anytime’ to pick it up, and then followed a
‘Laurel and Hardy’ routine that would have had Leon Schuster reaching for his
camera...
And single-lane closures are not the exception, they
seem to be the rule, on many occasions. Even when the road is busy.
Speaking with various staff on both occasions, they
admit (upon questioning) that much of the operations is in a ‘shambles’, and,
to quote one attendant on the day, a ‘Mickey Mouse Operation’.
Entilini – get your act together – you are performing
below par.
Chris Grinton
Sandcastle
competition
Valley Pre-primary is holding their annual sandcastle building competition
on Saturday 13th February on the
The RAHB was initially concerned with the health threats created by the
Water quality in
Levels
of ecoli per 100ml in samples taken from the ocean (HB07 and HB09), the mouth
of the
As
can be seen all sites sampled in August were unsafe for human contact but all
samples in September were safe. The
reason for this is primarily rainfall with more rain falling in August which
has the effect of “flushing” faecal matter into storm water drains and into the
rivers and down to the ocean. I would
anticipate that the ecoli levels would be substantially lower in Dec/Jan and
Feb than they are in the graph below which suggests the water on the east side
of
The big picture divorced
from the polluted
I
do wish to stress at this juncture that all of Hout Bay’s sewerage is pumped
out to sea below the Sentinel and that the CSIR report commissioned to asses
the consequences of this fallout suggests that under certain environmental
conditions (such as sustained westerly and south westerly winds) this outflow
will be blown into the bay and towards the beach. Under such circumstances the health of people
using the waters in
In
conclusion:
The
Dr
M. Justin O’Riain (Ward forum representative for the environment, Ward 74)
Poisonous Disa Water
Watch
Following our article in last month’s Hout and About we received the
following correspondence from a resident.
“I am
responding to your article in January´s newsletter regarding the VERY toxic
It is unquestionable - our
Damage to Council
property: Perpetrators to Pay
The city
is in the process of drawing up a system wherein damages to city property can
be claimed against the perpetrator. This document is now in its final
stages. The most problematical issue is the proper identification of the
driver or in instance of vicarious responsibility the owner of the vehicle.
However,
parallel to this the City have a test project wherein rewards can/may be paid
to suppliers of information and this is being considered to tow truckers in the
“test period” who invariably attend scenes first and then whisk
perpetrators away before they can be correctly identified.
In
October last year (2009) the City Manager instructed that the pursuit of
persons responsible for damaging Council property, including those who do so
via vehicle accidents, and the preparation and management of claims against
them IS TO BE HANDLED BY THE SPECIALISED SERVICES BRANCH OF THE CITY’S SAFETY
AND SECURITY DIRECTORATE. That Directorate has accepted the assignment and has
already designated senior persons to take charge of the activity. Those persons
are:
Senior
person overseeing the function:
Mr
Rudi Wiltshire
Chief
– Specialised Services
Ph
021 900 1719 or 084 599 8884
Offices:
Municipal Offices at
Corner
of Carinus and Van Riebeeck Streets
Rudolf.Wiltshire@capetown.gov.za
Manager
directly handling the function
Mr
Neil Arendse
Assistant
Chief - Metals and Theft Unit
Ph
021 900 4021 or 078 472 5903
Offices:
Ground floor of Housing offices
Corner
of Kool and Ganna Streets
Melton
Rose.
To
Firstly, a happy and above all a safe 2010 for all.
The general crime situation in
Beach Estate is still one of the hardest hit areas in terms of
crime in
There is a clear trend that House breaking and attempted house
breakings are occurring mainly between 17h00 and 18h00. The assumption is that
this is the time frame when most domestics have left, that the alarm is probably
not set and that perpetrators and thieves can disappear amongst the general
flow of traffic when others are going back to IY etc. SSPs shift changes
and SAPS changes are also occurring during this time and they are not keen to
respond as they will then work (unpaid) overtime.
HELP FIND FOUR
BIKES
STOLEN
FROM
HOUT
BAY ALCOHOL & DRUG ACTION GROUP COMMUNITY PROJECT
REWARD
OFFERED
PHONE
: 021 790 3089 or 076 556 2462
OR
WATCHCON ON 021 790 9333
Please
help us to find our four stolen Red/Black AVALANCHE mountain bikes that were
sponsored by the Pedal Power Association as a diversion programme from
substance abuse. On Sunday evening 4
bikes like those in the pictures below were stolen from a double locked area so
the thief came prepared and knew the bikes were inside.
House Robberies: Some
Advice from SAPS
Reject
and report stolen goods: If you buy stolen goods, more victims
will suffer, because you provide a market for these goods and an incentive for
criminals to keep stealing them. Receiving stolen goods is also punishable by
law. Reject any goods you suspect could have been stolen and report it to the
police on Crime Stop 08600 10111.
PREVENT HOUSE ROBBERY AND THEFT
• Know all emergency numbers.
• Never open the door automatically whenever the bell rings or if someone
knocks. Make completely sure the person wanting to enter is expected. Domestic
workers, garden staff and children are often approached by robbers who act as
telephone or TV repairmen, electricians, plumbers, TV licence or municipality
inspectors and many other professions. In an effort to gain entrance robbers
use a cellphone and make as if they are talking to the owner of the house so as
to put pressure on unsuspecting victims to open the gate or door. Those
remaining at home should be made aware of these scams.
•
Report suspicious characters who pose a threat to the police. When employing
someone request their identity document and make a copy thereof for
safekeeping. Check their previous employment references and do security clearances
at the police.
• Always keep you keys safe to prevent duplication thereof. Never leave your
house keys under a doormat or in a pot plant. Once you have locked your door
from the inside remove the key and place it in a safe place.
• Know your neighbours and build a relationship of mutual trust and support.
When going away inform them.
• It is always best to arrange with persons living in the same street as you to
be ready at all times to come to the rescue of one another in dangerous or
suspicious times. Exchange phone numbers or signalling methods when you find
yourself in distress. Your strength always lies in how many people are able to
support you in an emergency.
• If you buy luxury goods, cut up the boxes and dispose of these in tied black
bags- a branded box is a telltale sign of what thieves could find in your
house.
SAPS CRIME STOP : 08600 10111
SAPS EMERGENCY LINE : 10111
www.saps.gov.za
We invite you to join the Resident’s
Association by sending an email to rahb@houtbay.org.za and we can send you details re
membership and alert you to some of the important issues that might affect you
as a resident of Hout
Bay
You might also want to use your
skill to help the Association operate and participate in community affairs
MEMBERSHIP
(R50 per couple, R30 per individual)
Forms from Chairperson or
Library. Association’s Banking Details:
FNB,
Subscriptions may be paid electronically (please use
your full name as a reference on the payment – to ensure that we correctly
credit your membership as this information appears on our Bank Statement
If you prefer, payment may also
be dropped into our wooden box at the Library (next to the Hall doors) or
posted to our Post Office Box: 27031
Len
Swimmer
Chairperson,
Residents’ Assoc of
Tel:
790-0268, Email: lens@telkomsa.net