Hout and About

News from Residents’ Association of Hout Bay

PO Box 27031, Hout Bay, 7872

rahb@houtbay.org.za    www.houtbay.org.za

June 2009

 

Proposed ‘Hout Bay Partnership’

Last month discussions continued between interested parties regarding the establishment of a Hout Bay partnership.  An interim steering committee was nominated and mandated to take the initiative forward.

The purpose of the partnership is not to duplicate or replace the work of the Ward Forum. The Partnership intended to be an asset to the Ward Forum, assisting the work of the Ward Forum. There will be active communication between the Partnership and the Ward Forum.

The mandate of the partnership will be developed and agreed by the partners: ensuring sound management of the urban, residential, public and natural spaces in Hout Bay; promoting Hout Bay as a desirable destination to live in, to do business in and to visit; and developing Hout Bay in a socially integrated and environmental sustainable way, meeting the diverse needs and interests of all those who live in Hout Bay.

CID vs SRA?

Hout Bay residents have discussed the formation of a City Improvement District (CID) initiative in Hout Bay.

Ian Neilson, Mayoral Committee member for Finance, Economic & Social Development and Tourism presented a possible alternative of a Special Rating Area (SPA) that incorporates CIDs for consideration.  A fact sheet on SRAs appears below:

What is an SRA?

A Special Rating Area (SRA) refers to a clearly defined geographical area, approved by the City of Cape Town, in which property owners can raise levies to fund ‘top up’ services for that specific area.

What is the regulatory framework governing SRAs?

SRAs are governed by Section 22 of the Municipal Property Rates Act (MPRA), the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA), Section 21 of the Companies Act, the SA Constitution, and the Cape Town’s City Improvement District By-law of 2004.

Why establish an SRA?

According to the SA Constitution (Sections 152 & 153), the objective of a local authority is to provide all its residents with certain basic services such as water, electricity, sanitation and refuse removal, etc – up to an equitable standard.  For communities who wish to enjoy municipal services of a higher level, an SRA provides them with the option of paying for these additional services, which should be affordable and sustainable.

What types of ‘top-up’ services are provided in a SRA?

Typically, these would be services dealing with issues of ‘crime and grime’ such as additional public safety measures, cleansing services, maintenance of infrastructure, upgrading of the environment, and social services to deal with vagrancy, etc.

What are the benefits for SRA members?

By pooling their resources in an SRA, individual property owners can enjoy the collective benefits of a well managed area, a shared sense of communal pride, safety and social responsibility, and access to joint initiatives such as waste recycling, energy-efficiency programmes, etc. In the end, these all translate into a tangible boost in property values and capital investments.

Are there different types of SRAs?

No, but an SRA can consist of industrial, commercial and residential components, or a combination of all three.

How many SRAs are there in Cape Town?

There are currently 16 SRAs in the City of Cape Town. Four communities have applied for establishment, and another 25 have expressed interest in establishing an SRA.

How does one establish an SRA?

An SRA is always initiated by a community, and not by the City.  It usually starts with ‘champions’ within a community who feel the necessity to upgrade the environment within the boundaries of a certain area. They then compile a business plan indicating how the improvements are to be achieved, and present this to the community at a public meeting. Thereafter property owners are lobbied for their support. A majority of 51% has to give written consent to the formation of an SRA.

‘Dontse Yakhe’ disaster

Disaster Management representative, Mark Pluke, highlighted the urgent need to relocate shacks at the fourth Imizamo Yethu Housing Project meeting held in May.

In February we reported on Disaster Managements concerns regarding Dontse Yakhe. “We feel that these shacks should be relocated as a matter of urgency as the current location (i.e. in the water reticulation pipe servitude) is exposing the entire Hout Bay area to unacceptable levels of risk”. The current location of these shacks is altering the water course of the overflow pipe which in turn is causing the damage to the access road.

CPF Chairman and RAHB Exco member Rob Patterson added that the lack of access for Fire Tenders to the top of IY is also unacceptable. 

 “If you look initially at the illegal wiring which is hanging so low in some instances that a normal size 4 x 4 vehicle would probably touch some wiring let alone a high fire tender.”

 “If a fire tender DOES reach the first of the two top fire hydrants on the back track that truck would practically be locked in. As has happened previously, only one truck can go up or down from the Hughenden new gate. Should a fire start then the stream of residents plus cars loaded with personal possessions heading out and down towards the Hughenden gate would make access to fire / emergency vehicles totally impossible.”

The notorious Erf 666

(opp. Bergendal)

Erf 666 Main Road, continues to be an unsightly problem! The enormous dirt berms adjacent to Main Road are an eyesore and encroach on the stand of poplar trees and wetlands.

RAHB has been in contact with the Government of the Western Cape and at the beginning of May the Association received the following response:

With regards to Erf 666 a joint inspection was conducted by our Law Enforcement section with officials from Integrated Environmental Management, the City of Cape Town and DWAF. The owner and her attorney were also present. The officials made it clear to the owner (Mrs. Anita Gouveia) and her attorney that all activities being carried out on site are to be ceased immediately. They were also instructed to stop with the construction of the berm until they have conducted the necessary impact  assessments on site, although in terms of the zoning regulations they are allowed to construct a berm or stockpile at a height not exceeding 3 meters (unless, of course, it is within a wetland or flood plain). The owner is out of time in submitting this report in terms of our notification but we have afforded her a final extension of 21 working days from today's date to submit the report.

RAHB responded requesting that a watchful eye be kept on the site and that the berm be reduced to 3m as well as compliance with the EIA and Public Participation processes that will be required if the land is developed.  We await further developments and will keep the Association informed. 

The latest letter from DEA& DP (‘the Green Scorpions’) reports as follows:

“The study which the owner is directed to submit is to include an assessment of the wetland system and any impacts on this system by the owner's activities, mitigation measures and a rehabilitation plan. The study is also to deal with the nature and extent of the flood plain and assess similar impacts and propose similar measures to mitigate and rehabilitate any impacts in the flood plain. The owner is out of time in submitting this report in terms of our notification but we have afforded her a final extension of 21 working days from today's date to submit the report”.

In the interim they have undertaken to remove the dumped sand and builders rubble that is located close to the wetland and also to fence off the property to prevent any illegal dumping. We are awaiting the written confirmation of this undertaking.

Proposed ‘iBurst’ base station

Whilst acknowledging the merit of better wireless internet coverage, the Association is concerned about the concomitant increase in radiation outfall.  To this end, the Association has questioned the application for Wood St (off Main Road) for a land use departure for the installation of yet another addition to cell mast for a wireless internet base station and antennae system (for IBurst).

Two Berg-en-Dal residents, who live near the cellular base station reported they had no knowledge of the project and have not been consulted.  They (and others) are not happy with the Base Station, its multiple masts and increasing radiation levels in such a densely populated residential area. 

RAHB requested that the applicant be required to ensure that the local community particularly those living within 400 metres of the base station be given opportunity to object/comment.

The Association also notes that the City’s regulations for Cellular Telecommuni-cation Infrastructure (CTI) Policy asks for projected RF emission levels to be provided with each application. These have either not been done or not made available – probably the former. 

RAHB also drew attention to the imminent development of satellite technology that will obviate the need for unsightly and expensive cell phone towers/masts and thus  reduce potential risks of continuous low level radiation impacts on surrounding residents, especially children.   

Resolution to ‘Greens’ crisis

Residents of Hout Bay are greatly relieved by the peaceful resolution to our ‘garden greens crisis’.  It is imperative that a community (that aims to send zero waste to landfill) has a local garden waste recycling facility at hand.

The City proposes to clear the site of all greens. Thereafter, the surface will be attended to; leveled and hardened where necessary. Sand berms will be constructed adjacent to residents to provide a buffer between greens recycling activities and living space, and, the new City garden refuse contractor will chip in the far corner of the site, away from residents and with a smaller machine.

 

Illegal signage

RAHB has once more approached the City with regard to illegal signage. 

“We are desperate in Hout Bay to get the illegal signs removed and it is this desperation that led us to believe that the Contractor for Hout Bay has left the area as no illegal signage has been removed for some time now, in spite of Selwyn Klassen’s valiant efforts. The ‘Pearl of Hout Bay’, (which was up for auction in Johannesburg as a 4 star hotel) is a classic example as it flouts its illegal signage on an important scenic route (Victoria Avenue) and so does ‘Pirates Grill’. They all cock a snoot at Council regulations and laws, in spite of Selwyn’s efforts.

The latest culprit is Investec & Vector Construction on Princess Street (also a scenic route). These people couldn’t care less and are getting away with their laissez faire attitude. Please can someone, somehow, do something for us – we have reached a cul-de-sac with no-one and nobody to turn to in this massive signage pollution problem.”

We are waiting for a new plan of action!

 

Erf 7754 Valley Road

The Association submitted comment on an application to amend various conditions of zoning to enable the accommodation of an institution (a ‘substance abuse / process additions’ clinic).

While our Association appreciates the need for clinics in society, we have some concerns with this application particularly from a planning perspective.

First, the clinic is operating without planning permission.  We are generally hesitant to support retrospective applications unless there is a good reason to do so. 

Second, the application document did not adequately explain the background of the previous land-use changes and associated conditions set by the Provincial Adminis-tration in January 2006. 

This erf has had an unfortunate history with previous owners/operators flouting the zoning scheme regulations, holiday accommodation policy, regulations regarding development below the 50 year flood plain, and more recently the conditions associated with its rezoning. 

The new owner is left with an unfortunate legacy but we believe that this needs to be dealt with and the conditions of re-zoning complied with before further departures are contemplated.    

Previously, the Provincial Government eventually allowed the rezoning of the erf for the purposes of an unlicensed hotel with 16 rooms with a maximum of 32 guests.  However, clear conditions were spelt out at that time, together with the proviso that, if they were not complied with, the municipality would enforce them at the expense of the owner. 

In the current application there is no evidence that these conditions have been complied with or whether the excess unlawful buildings have been demolished. 

The new owner / applicant now wants to extend the maximum number of guests (32 in 16 rooms) to 52 overnight guests.  And it appears that the clinic is currently operating unlawfully (without planning permission) and now the applicant expects that the operation should be retrospectively sanctioned without, it seems, complying with the original rezoning conditions clearly specified by the Provincial Administration.   The application now lies with the City for a decision as to how to move forward. 

 

Other planning matters

Cape Town Zoning Scheme – 5th & final draft:  We received a copy of this document to comment on and are working through it slowly together with other associations allied to the Greater Cape Town Civic Alliance (GCTCA).  We attended a general meeting of the GCTCA where the City planner who is leading the process of integrating the 27 schemes in the metropole, updated the Alliance on some of the changes that have been made to the draft integrated zoning scheme.  He demonstrated some implications of the proposed new scheme using a computer graphics model to illustrate worst case scenarios.  We are concerned about the Overlay document as nothing has been included for Hout Bay, although the opportunity exists for the creation of Overlays in the future.  This Final Draft is to be presented to Province in the next few months along with any further comments that are collected.  Quite a lot of good changes have been made to the original draft, but there are still areas of concern that need attention.

Other planning tools such as the District Plans and the Environmental Management Frameworks are also in the pipeline and should be available for comment this year.  A presentation by the City planner responsible for these projects has been arranged by the GCTCA on Saturday 20 June at the Rondevlei Nature Reserve lecture Room at 10 a.m. 

Various City Policies are being updated,  revised or newly formulated and then made available for comment, e.g. policies on ‘cultural and heritage landscapes’, ‘problem building strategies’ and ‘boundary walls and fence guidelines’. 

Integrated Coastal Management Act, No 24 of 2008:  We have been exploring this powerful act with respect to our coastal area and the proposed development that has been threatening on the Hout Bay dunes. 

 

Coral Close Encroachment

RAHB has been dealing with an issue since  2007.  It relates to the encroachment into Council land by the resident of erf 7903 Coral Close (Mr. Wilmering).  Writing to City representatives, the Association once again raised the issue of his unlawful occupation of public land.  We have been told that the City’s legal department is dealing with it. 

 “The owner has made excessive use of Coral Close and the adjacent Public Place (erf 4165) piling huge boulders on this erf (which is alongside of Coral Close) for his own purposes, and has used the area not only to store a container and boulders but also to break the boulders up for building purposes.  

Large boulders were placed (like informal pillars) at the Guinevere Avenue entrance to Coral Close giving the impression that, from there on, it was private property – of course it is not, but, to those who do not know this, it can be a bit intimidating and misleading.  A large metal container was placed outside the entrance gate,  in the road reserve.  Round about then we specifically asked the municipality to get the offender to remove the container and to stop using the road reserve as though it was his own property, but, in spite of inspections and notices being served, nothing concrete happened. 

Since then the owner has clad the container with rock and put a tiled pitch roof onto it – it now looks like the ‘gate cottage’ to this ‘estate’!  Large pot plants were positioned outside his property adding to the impression that the area is privately owned.

The boulders have now been lined up along the adjacent erf and a low stone & cement wall has been built – all on public land which is mainly road reserve but also on the edge of the adjacent erf zoned Public Open Space.

We understand that the Council is following due legal process in dealing with this issue and we shall be meeting with them shortly. 

 

Rights to privatise roads?

Following complaints from residents in the Victorskloof area, RAHB wrote to the City  regarding an unlawful sign (‘PRIVATE’) situated at the entrance to a public dirt road at the end of Victorskloof  Road.  A local resident in the vicinity has apparently brick-paved the road and installed this large sign which suggests that the road and land beyond it, is private.  Paving the road is no excuse to now unilaterally proclaim it as a private road. 

This is especially unacceptable as the road is an historical route and is part of the very old Bains Road which must be kept open to the public for posterity as it is one of our important heritage amenities in Hout Bay.

Mark Doubell of the City commented,

All work that has been constructed is unauthorised, and the owner failed to collect the registered letter. Mr Dookoo has informed the owner Mr Jahn Sums, that he is not allowed to construct any structures within the designated road reserve and would need permission and approved plans for all services prior to constructing a Road. This instruction was totally ignored. Mr Sums unilaterally built illegal structures within the road reserve and will require a high level intervention from the City of Cape Town, as this matter will definitely have to follow a legal process.

We would appreciate residents working with the Council and not cause them unnecessary hassles (and time wasting) as in the two cases listed above. 

Feedback on wetlands and beach

We are pleased to report that the second clearing of the alien vegetation at the Longkloof weir has been completed.  The next phase of wetland rehabilitation in both the upper and lower section of the Disa River will be the planting of indigenous trees to shade out other alien vegetation  and to reduce the density of reeds in the lower valley.

Dumping on Erf 559 (on the dunes along Princess Street) was stopped following a member of the public reporting the incident.  A close eye needs to be kept on dumping as it often leads others dumping in the same place.   

 

Winning the War?

Last month ‘law enforcement’ reported the successful arrest of more than 17 suspects for house robbery in the Constantia/Tokai area. A task team of investigators assisted by a security service providers “Mountain Men Security” who operate in the Tokai area engaged in an operation to arrest the house breaking suspects.

A breakthrough was made when the Mountain Men security personnel, known in the area for their tracking ability, followed the spoor of 3 suspects linked to the scene of a house robbery in the suburb of Zwaanswyk/Tokai through the densely forested slopes of the Constantiaberg Mountains. The security personnel went to a location just above Imizamo Yethu informal settlement in Hout Bay, where they estimated the spoor was leading them and laid an ambush with members of SAPS. At dawn contact was made with the suspects, which sparked a police investigation which resulted in the arrest of 17 suspects and the seizure of a vast amount of stolen property recovered by SAPS.

Inspector Rodney Franks of Kirstenhof SAPS said “An investigation of this magnitude has never been undertaken in our station area.” The first suspects were arrested on the morning of Tuesday 28 April in a pre-dawn raid crack down by police officials. Items seized included cell phones, watches, laptops, power tools, cameras, digital cameras and jewelry. The last of the current suspects totaling 17, were arrested in areas ranging from Imizamo Yethu in Hout Bay, to the Du Noon settlement in Milnerton on Friday 8 May 2009. The suspects range in age from 22 to 32, are able to speak fluent Afrikaans, are all Namibian nationals, some with military backgrounds. All of them had connections with a commercial fishing fleet in Hout Bay where they worked as commercial fishermen. The stolen items seized thus far has an estimated street value of around R2,000,000 (Two Million Rand) and many of these goods have already been linked to cases of house robberies and housebreaking reported at the following police stations: Kirstenhof, Diepriver, Wynberg, Claremont and Camps Bay. The suspects are due to appear at the Wynberg Magistrates Court on Monday 11 May 2009.

 

‘Open Chappies for the People’

The Association continues to campaign for the opening of Chapman’s Peak, the retention of the day pass,  re-appointment of a new Concessionaire, a forensic audit of the Public Private Partnership, the opening of the picnic areas and no new toll plazas.  Following an appeal to Premier Helen  Zille, we received the following response from Robin Carlisle, the newly appointed MEC for Transport, Roads and Public Works.

 “Further to my earlier email, I have been through the evaluative report, most of whose conclusions have already been made public.

We both know that when the Cape sandstones are disturbed their rate of weathering, eroding and destabilising accelerates. Since inception, Chappies has presented unique problems, and these have been compounded since 2002.

You know that I am sympathetic to most of your requests, and all are on the table plus a basketfull of alternatives.

Treasury and Transport are both dealing with this matter at Ministerial level.

The best solutions will take time to reach, but they will be just that.”

 

790tv.co.za

RAHB would like to acknowledge the great coverage by 790-TV on the ‘Chappies’ protest march last month!  They were the first to have the report made public via their website, even before the commercial TV stations appeared on the scene. 

A big thank you to Jonathan and his team for being a community platform to voice the opinions of Hout Bay and keep residents informed and entertained!

 

Our website is reaching far and wide!

The Association was recently approached by a resident of Minnesota, USA, “seeking Penny or Penelope Brown mentioned in your Hout Bay organization's report on the Internet.”  Penny, one of our ExCo members, was an AFS exchange student and through the RAHB website, the Stillwater High School in Minnesota was able to extend to her an invitation to their 40th class reunion! 

We are delighted our newsletter reaches so far across the world!   

 

 

Dear Hout Bay Resident,

We invite you to join the Resident’s Association by sending an email to rahb@houtbay.org.za and we can send you details re membership and alert you to some of the important issues that might affect you as a resident of Hout Bay in our monthly newsletter. 

You might also want to use your skill to help the Association operate and participate in community affairs

MEMBERSHIP

(R50 per couple, R30 per individual)

Forms from Chairperson or Library. Association’s Banking Details:  FNB, Hout Bay(code 204009) A/c: Residents Association of Hout Bay, A/c Number – 5345 1027 173. 

Subscriptions may be paid electronically (please use your full name as a reference on the payment – to ensure that we correctly credit your membership as this information appears on our Bank Statement

If you prefer, payment may also be dropped into our wooden box at the Library (next to the Hall doors) or posted to our Post Office Box: 27031 Hout Bay, 7872.

 

Len Swimmer

Chairperson, Residents’ Assoc of Hout Bay

Tel: 790-0268, Email: lens@telkomsa.net