Hout and About

News from Residents’Association of Hout Bay

PO Box 27031, Hout Bay, 7872

rahb@houtbay.org.za    www.houtbay.org.za

October 2007

Frogs versus foundations?fauna, flora and folk - the time is, NOW.

It is remarkable to see a previously alien infested, virtually lifeless piece of land being transformed into a vibrant haven for endangered animals.  Such has been the success of the recent Hout Bay Wetland Rehabilitation Project that after the first winter, two endangered species of frog have arrived and left the waters teaming with their tadpoles.  It is wonderful that natural systems are so resilient - if you offer them a lifeline.

 

Unfortunately there is little to offer once a concrete foundation has been laid and entire areas are developed.  The next time you walk, or motor along Princess Drive, look towards the sea and take note of the existing open spaces with the dunes in the background.  Better still take a walk through this area you will be amazed at the diversity of plants and animals clinging tenuously to life on the urban fringe.  Soon the rumble of diesel engines may unceremoniously smear this life into untidy heaps so that the straight lines of foundations can be carved and filled with concrete.

 

Another happy developer, another lost ecological jewel – Hout Bay’s natural heritage crown is looking more like an ‘ou doek’.  Developers have rights too, we are often told, and much of the reason why residents bump heads with developers is that previous Town Planners effortlessly carved up the geographically and ecologically diverse Hout Bay as though it were a flat, homogenous sand plain.

 

So, here we sit with the left hand restoring areas to their former functional glory, while the right hand signs off plans to put houses in dune fields and wetlands.  The Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) have their hands full, ploughing through the paperwork of ‘for versus against’ arguments.  They have impressed upon us (RAHB) that the more people from our community that add their voices to the outcry for a semblance of reason, the better.  We have to think beyond the short term windfalls realised by the few developers and fight hard for the preservation of a landscape shaped over the millennia that is fit for fauna, flora and folk.  Your voice will be asked for in the near future and we hope you will sing as one.

 

PENDING DESTRUCTION OF THE BEACH DUNE-FIELDS

 

It is urgent that the attention of the public is drawn to what is happening regarding the future of the dune-fields between Princess Street and the Beach, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE AND THE DUNES ARE COVERED IN HARD DEVELOPMENT / CONCRETE and lost forever as a natural system and buffer area between the beach and the residential area of Beach Estate! 

 

This existing ‘dune field’ has long since been identified as an area worth conserving – it is the beach-end  remnant of the original large dune which, until about 20 years ago, used to stretch from Hout Bay Beach over the nek to Sandy Bay, much of the rest of which has been covered by houses.  This remaining dune field forms an important interface between the beach and the residential area and acts not only to absorb much of the energy and sand generated by the southeaster which can blow very intensely for days or even weeks at a time between September and April, but also to maintain an aesthetic and environmental boundary heralding the beach area and creating a unique sense of space and identity that makes Hout Bay the special place that it is.

Specifically, in this current case, an application was lodged in March this year and comment/objections were invited on the proposed rezoning of erf 559, situated in the dunes along Princess Street, West of  the Beach Club.  The application is for the rezoning of this erf from Amenities to Subdivisional Area in order to permit the subdivision of the site into 4 single residential erven and one Private Open Space.  While this may not seem so onerous on first impression, one needs to realize that such a precedent can lead only one way, and that is the resultant and inevitable destruction or demise of the dunes. 

 

We have asked our Councillor to get the City Council to look at the area as a whole, before any decision is made on erf 559 and other applications, in order to reassess how to deal with this sensitive area, generally. As a result of this, a Motion (see below) was tabled at the Good Hope Subcouncil which will be dealt with at PEPCO – Planning Environment Portfolio Committee.

Good Hope SubCouncil Motion regarding the Beach area was submitted by Cllr Haywood on  20 the 20th September 2007, accepted and passed on to the City’s Planning and Environment Portfolio Committee (PEPCO). 

THE MOTION - Hout Bay:  Proposed Master Plan for area including Beach, Dunes, River and Estuary

Background:  A number of inappropriate hard developments have been proposed recently in the vicinity of the dune fields between Princess Road and the Beach.  On considering the detail of these applications and the unfortunate consequences that have resulted from the environmentally-inappropriate positioning of the existing ‘Beach Club’ development on the estuary, it has become increasingly obvious that the Council needs to look at this area as a whole so as to be able to guide development and conservation in a responsible manner, bearing in mind that this area has long since officially (as per the 1986 Structure Plan) been earmarked for recreational parkland with no hard development as such.  It has also been identified as a natural heritage area and, as such, one of the elements essential to the character and sustainability of Hout Bay as an attractive tourist destination.

It is proposed that:

(a) a Master Plan for the Hout Bay coastal area including the Beach, Dunes, River and Estuary and adjacent public and private land be developed as a matter of urgency, taking into consideration biodiversity conservation, environmental management, amenity, sport, recreation and landscape plans, in consultation with interested and affected parties;

(b) all new developments on public land and the sale of public land in these affected areas in the interim be halted until this plan has been developed and approved;

(c) the Director: Spatial Planning be requested to submit a report in the above regard to PEPCO for consideration

We have not heard yet when the motion will be discussed at PEPCO.

 

REPORT BACK ON SQUATTERS ON THE BEACH:

Most of the illegal shacks have been removed. It has been established that some of the squatting was due to absentee landlords owning properties on the beach. These landlords have been issued with Notices by the Municipality to have these shacks removed off their properties, or face prosecution. They have also been advised to remove the alien vegetation on their land.

PLANNING APPLICATIONS

 

1.  Erf 4870, Karbonkelberg (mountainside above Harbour Road):  A background information document (BID) has been received on the proposed rezoning of a portion of  Erf 4870 which is one of 5 rural erven in this area (each about 21 hectares), all of which are completely outside the urban edge.  The purpose of the BID is to inform interested and affected parties (IAPs) about the undertaking of a Basic Assessment (BA) for the proposed project and it constitutes the beginnings of of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as required by law.  This is dealt with by the Provincial Government’s Department of Environment Affairs and Development Planning

According to the BID, a planning application will also be lodged with the local authority in parallel with the EIA.  We have not received this.  No doubt this will be a substantial set of documents because such a proposal will require substantial departures and changes to numerous aspects of legislation and policy. 

Our Association, amongst others, has consistently and vigorously opposed proposals for development beyond the Urban Edge as they make a mockery of the Urban Edge Policy which was established with extensive public participation over a number of years. 

There will be a public meeting at 18h00 on Tuesday 23 October 2007 in the Library Hall (and posters will be displayed from 17h00) and the deadline for written comments is Monday 5 November 2007.  To register for this process contact Jeremy Blood, CCA Environmental, PO Box 10145, Caledon Square, 7905, Cape Town, email jeremy@ccaenvironmental.co.za, tel. 021 461-1118, fax 021 461-1120

 

DHILSHAAD SAMAAI

FOR DIRECTOR: PLANNING & BUILDING DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT

 Comments and objections may be sent to: The Municipal Manager, Strategy & Planning –Directorate: Town Planning, South Peninsula Region, City of Cape Town, Private Bag X5, Plumstead 7801 or faxed to 021 710-8283 (tel.-8202); attention Mrs D. Samaai.  The general telephone number for the SPA is 710-8000.

Report back on previous applications

We attended Goodhope Subcouncil meeting on the 20th September when our issues (see below) were remanded to be heard on the 1st October as the Planning Officials were asked to prepare a proper presentation to the Subcouncil on VAMP – the Victoria Avenue Management Plan.

Erf 8622 Bethal Rd: application for a temporary land use departure to permit a B&B

This recommended for approval subject to certain conditions, among these was to regularise the wooden out buildings.

Erf 8623 Boardwalk, Victoria Avenue: application for temporary land use departure, regulation departure, and the amendment of the site development plan and conditions . We vigorously opposed this application for a motor vehicle service centre inside a residential block with insufficient parking - it is also contrary in all respects to VAMP. Our objections were heard and the decision of the Subcouncil was to refuse this application in its entirety.

Erf 70 Victoria Avenue: application for a temporary land use departure, to permit an art gallery. Our contention that the VAMP does not permit commercial activity above Oxford Street was upheld and the decision by the Subcouncil was to refuse this application.

Erf 5681 Curves Gym,Victoria Avenue:

The initial application was for a temporary land use departure to permit an art gallery later changed to permit operation of a wellness gym for ladies – a franchise called “Curves”. As with the previous application, this erf, above Oxford Street, falls outside the commercial zone according to VAMP. It is also contrary to the parking requirements of VAMP. Our objection was heard and the Subcouncil’s decision was to refuse this application.  

 

Signage proliferation on Victoria Avenue – Requirements of VAMP (Victoria Avenue Management Plan):

6.5  Urban design and landscaping (2nd para.)

The current proliferation of advertising signage should be restricted, with an indication of the location and format of signage.  It is recommended that signage should not transgress the current 5 m building line”. 

Our Association will be dealing with the Municipality on this issue and businesses with unlawful signage will be given notice for such signs to be removed.

 

 

Len Swimmer

Chairperson, Residents’ Assoc of Hout Bay

Tel: 790-0268, Email: lens@telkomsa.net

           

Dear Hout Bay Resident,

Would you like warning of any of the following possibilities?

- Your neighbour is about to sell their house to a developer who will be bulldozing it and others in your street to construct a block of flats

- The beach is covered in raw sewerage following another failure by the pump station

- Your neighbour is going to subdivide their property and build four more houses

- Imizamo Yethu is going to expand or shrink

- A new hotel is to be constructed right on the beachfront

- Safety & Security issues which affect house values and desirability of living in Hout Bay

For many in Hout Bay, one or more of these possibilities is already a reality. 

The Residents Association of Hout Bay tries to inform the public long before such changes adversely affect the value of your home or the well-being of those that live in it.

We invite you to join the Resident’s Association by sending an email to rahb@houtbay.org.za and we can send you details re membership and alert you to some of the important issues that might affect you as a resident of Hout Bay in our monthly newsletter. 

 

 

You might also want to use your skill to help the Association operate and participate in community affairs

MEMBERSHIP

(R50 per couple, R30 per individual)

Forms from Chairperson or Library.     Please Note: As from 1st March all Membership fees for the year 2007 were due and payable. No accounts will be sent out.

               

Association Banking Details:  First National Bank, Hout Bay Branch (branch code 204 009), Account name - Residents Association of Hout Bay, Account Number – 5345 1027 173. 

Subscriptions may be paid electronically (use your full name as a reference on the payment – to ensure that we correctly credit your membership as this information appears on our Bank Statement

If you prefer, payment can also be dropped into our wooden box at the Library (next to the Hall doors) or posted to our Post Office Box: 27031 Hout Bay, 7872.