Hout and About

News from Residents’Association of Hout Bay

PO Box 27031, Hout Bay, 7872

rahb@houtbay.org.za       www.houtbay.org.za

February 2006

 

‘SPELUM’ INTERVIEWS

Our Association has had a number of interviews with the Council’s Spatial Planning, Environment and Land Use Management (SPELUM) committee during this past year.  We are increasingly concerned that SPELUM is repeatedly disregarding existing Development Plans, Guidelines and Policies without replacing them with sensible alternatives.  While we do have sympathy with the need for change, we are appalled at the ad hoc manner in which ‘decision making’ is proceeding and the lack of consideration of the cumulative effects of these decisions on the sustainability of the local infrastructure and the valuable ‘sense of place’ that typifies much of Hout Bay, which is, itself, a declared ‘Special Area’.  The policy on densification, for example, is being ignored and the committee is making decisions in a thumb-suck manner without considering the cumulative effects of densification on the roads (congestion and safety) in particular.    Rezoning for dense developments is being allowed without any commitment to improve infrastructure – the lowest priority having been allocated to the proposed High Level Road, which is intended to alleviate the overloaded and dangerous upper Main Road.  

If justice could be applied, these councillors should be held accountable for the potential damage that they are inflicting - however, it is likely that once the real damage manifests itself, they will be comfortably in ‘another position’ while residents will have to shoulder the consequences of this lack of foresight.  Nonetheless, the Council may well be laying itself open to litigation, especially with respect to road accident victims.

 

NEW PLANNING APPLICATIONS

Council:  Comments and objections may be sent (before the specified deadline in each case) to: The Municipal Manager, Urban and Environmental Services, South Peninsula Admin, City of Cape Town, Private Bag X5, Plumstead 7801 or faxed to 021 710-8283 (tel.-8202); attention Mr. M. Barnes.  The general telephone number for the SPA is 710-8000. 

DEADP:  Comments to be sent to Dept of Environmental and Development Planning: Land Development Management, Private Bag X9083, Cape Town 8000 or fax to 483-3098 (tel.  -2700 for Environment and -4789 for Planning) in time to arrive by the deadline.   

 

Erf 3016 Victoria Ave/Victor Street (NW crn):  Application for a land use departure to permit a B&B Category 1 (max 5 persons or two bedrooms) in terms of the Holiday Accommodation Policy.  Deadline for comment (send to SPA) – Sat 4 March 06

Erf 4454 - Main Road (opposite Dorman Road):  Application for conditional use of agricultural plot for Montessori Pre-Primary School for 53 children (maximum 90).  Deadline for comment (send to SPA) - Friday 10 March 06.

Erf 1491 - Disa River Farm, Main Road:  Application from ‘Lets Trade 1044 CC’ for the removal of restrictive title conditions on an agricultural erf for a departure for commercial use by owner and tenants for earthmoving equipment hire, landscaping company, making compost, storing soil, parking and servicing equipment and trucks, and storage of trucks.  This will involve approx. 60 people working on site.  We believe that the scale of such activity is not appropriate to the area and would be more suited to an industrial area.  Deadline for comment (send to DEADP, cc SPA) – Friday 10 March 06. 

Erf 1827 - No 4 Helgarda Road, off Victoria Ave:  Application for (1) the removal of restrictive title conditions (preventing subdivision of properties in this township and the development of more than one third of the property thereby protecting the character of the area); (2) for the subdivision of a single residential erf into five erven of between 545 and 628 sq.m which are all less than the general minimum size for Hout Bay (650 sq.m) as specified in the Zoning Scheme Regulations and much less than the minimum in the development plan for this township; (3) to relax the 8 m street building lines from 8 metres to 3 m, 4.8 m and 2.1 m on portions 1, 5 and 3 respectively, (4) to waive the street building line for the refuse room on portion 4.  We believe that these various restrictions were specifically imposed to protect the character of the area and the sustainability of the infrastructure particularly now when land is at a premium. Deadline for comment (send to DEADP and SPA) – Friday 10 March 06. 

Erf 652 - between Empire and Clyde Streets:  Proposed lease of 252 sq m. of unmade public road for garden and security purposes. 

Comments to Ms B. Isaacs, Property Management Services, Private Bag X2, Plumstead 7800, fax 021 710-8375 (tel.-8382)

 

UP-DATE ON PREVIOUS ISSUES

Erf 3074 La Mont, 41 Andrews Road:  The Council planning committee (SPELUM) approved, on 11 Feb 06, the proposed subdivision in spite of the many objections lodged.  Although the applicant had adjusted the smaller portion of the subdivision to the minimum erf size for Scott Estate (650 sq.m), objectors were still of the opinion that this is not in keeping with the policy indicating larger erf sizes in the proximity of the urban edge, and are concerned about the lack of cognisance taken of the impact of inappropriate off-site parking and of the multiple accesses/egresses on this steep bit of Andrews Road.  Moreover, the responsible official continues to dispute the High Court ruling regarding minimum plot size, in spite of the Province and the Council having had to pay the costs of the previous court case.  Appeals were lodged on 14 Feb.

Erven 1592 &1630 Linden Farm, Main Road:  We received notification that the applicant has appealed to the Province to make a decision on this application for rezoning, subdivision and departures in lieu of the Council, because they (the Council) have taken too long to rule on it.  We lodged a counter appeal on 17 Feb 06 drawing attention to our original letter of objection and the untenable situation that will be created should this proposal go ahead due to the increase in traffic coming from an extra 40 houses accessing Main Road on an unacceptably dangerous section of upper Main Road. 

Kronendal Farm (erven 673,1286, 1792, 4029, 5627, 669 & 1297):  The Council planning committee (SPELUM) has recently (11 Feb 06) recommended, for approval by the Province, the multi-faceted LUPO application to develop the old farmlands.  This follows the Province’s positive Record of Decision on the Environmental Impact Report on the environmental aspects of the proposal, subject to numerous conditions.  We have followed (and inputted into) the various proposals very carefully over many years, and do acknowledge that the earlier plans, many of which were most inappropriate, have been changed and modified considerably so as to meet various community concerns.  However, we were disappointed, when, at the SPELUM committee meeting that we attended recently, the councillors did not even try to deal with some remaining issues that needed attention, and that we were given very little time to study the final detailed official recommendations.  We do, however, welcome the decision not to split the application into the ‘retirement village’ and the ‘rest of the property’; we shall continue to participate in whatever structures are available to try and ensure sustainable and appropriate development of this very precious ‘heart’ of Hout Bay.   

Erf 4851, Earl Street crn Albert Road: Application for rezoning from Commercial (Offices Only) to Commercial Use.  This was the third time that this application has been made and, once again, it was recommended for REFUSAL by the City officials.  Unfortunately, this time, it was approved by SPELUM subject to conditions.  Appeal pending. 

Erf 1813, 1 Doris Road:  Application for removal of restriction, subdivision and conditional use as a nursery school.  This was approved for subdivision pending removal of restriction being approved by Province.  Appeal pending.

Erf 4558, Saddlers Row:  Application for departure and subdivision was recommended for REFUSAL by City officials due to non-compliance with Victorskloof Development Plan, but was approved by SPELUM.  Appeal pending. 

Erf 1492, Franciscus House, Main Road:  Application for departures and subdivision was approved subject to withdrawal of building line departure along Main Road from 8m to 5m.  The number of erven were reduced from 16 to 15 but the official recommendation for a minimum erf size of 1000 sq.m was overturned in favour of 650 sq.m.  Appeal pending. 

Erf 7754, Panache, Valley Road:  We received notification from DEADP that the applicant’s appeal to Province to make a decision on this application (in lieu of the Council doing so) was upheld.  The application has been approved subject to relatively stringent conditions including the demolition (within 6 months) of structures in excess of the approved site development plan.  

 

GENERAL COMMENT

As you can see above, we are dealing with many applications at present.  We would, however, like to point out that this is good news because many of these applications have been in the pipeline for a long time and are finally being processed – this is positive for both the applicants and the official planners.  We would like to commend those applicants who attempt to develop within the existing zoning scheme regulations and parameters laid out in guidelines and policies as this will help achieve some sort of sustainable balance to the long-term benefit of the community.  Unfortunately there are others who appear to be more interested in short-term gain.

 Len Swimmer

Chairperson, Residents’ Assoc of Hout Bay

Tel: 790-0268, Email: lens@telkomsa.net

MEMBERSHIP

Please note that subscriptions are now due and that our AGM will be on Mon 8 May.

(R50 per couple, R30 per individual)

Forms from Chairperson or Library.

                    Feb 2006